Hyundai Motor India clocked total April-June quarter FY2026 sales of 1,80,399 units in which 1,32,259 units were accounted for domestic sales while 48,140 units as exports.
“With the increased focus on exports, HMIL’s export contribution reached 26.7% to its total sales in Q1 of FY2026,” a company filing said.
Meanwhile, HMIL’s total monthly sales stood at 60,924 units in June with domestic sales accounting for 44,024 units while exports contributing 16,900 units.
Shares of Hyundai Motor today ended at Rs 2,236 on the NSE, gaining Rs 16.30 or 0.73%.
Commenting on HMIL sales, Tarun Garg, Whole-time Director and Chief Operating Officer said that the growth in exports underscores the global appeal of Hyundai vehicles. “We recorded a 13% year-on-year growth in export volumes for Q1 FY2026, with 48,140 units shipped compared to 42,600 units in the same period last year. This has elevated the share of exports to 26.7% of total sales in Q1 FY2026, up from 22.2% in Q1 FY2025,” Garg said.In the domestic market, the geopolitical situation continued to affect the market sentiment with domestic sales registering 44,024 units in June 2025, Garg highlighted.”As we come closer to the beginning of production at the Talegaon plant, we remain cautiously optimistic about a gradual recovery of demand, supported by reduction in repo rates and improving liquidity on account of a cut in CRR. We are closely watching the global geopolitical scenario and are committed to delivering value and innovation to our customers across both domestic and export markets,” he added.
Hyundai Motor India had reported a 3.7% YoY decline in consolidated net profit at Rs 1,614 crore in Q4FY25 as against Rs 1,677 crore reported in the year-ago period. The company’s revenue from operations in the March-ended quarter stood at Rs 17,940 crore, which was up 1.5% versus Rs 17,671 crore in the corresponding quarter of the last financial year.
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)